Perceptions updateIndex of PerceptionsPerceptions site mapsearch Perceptions
UEF Theory
comment + criticism welcome
`Perceptions' ITEM
Copyright © 2009 Ray Dickenson
Welcome - Chinese Peace - Arabic
Dream - Russian Soul Duty - Sanskrit

SETI Gift 2



S.E.T.I. detector - of f.t.l. transmission by UEF modulation

(update to letter of 23 March 1999)

Date 30 April 1999

Re: SETI Gift

Pages: 1, including this

Hello, you may not remember my letter (of 23 March ) that gave a prospective detector of ftl communication. The theory behind the offer was part of patent applications which prevented me from going into details - details that maybe would [have] added some credence to what I admit probably looked to be a fairly incredible scenario.

I now think I should make a gift of the whole theory to the world - along with all applications that I have been able to think of, which are many and various. These are now being published, among other places at "UEF"they mainly use the effects of UEF: gravitation, inertia (including all 'conservation' laws), nuclear 'forces', molecular threshold (gas-liquid-solid) 'forces', cellular & genetic 'forces', etc.

An application NOT readily thought of concerns the composition and travel of the basic UEF force or field. Large-scale, detectable natural perturbations in the field (I think) can only be caused by violent redistribution of mass - perhaps a star going nova but more likely the explosion of a galactic core (for whatever reason).

I think it is these perturbations that we mean when we talk of "gravity waves" and this explains why we cannot detect "gravity waves" by conventional [direct electromagnetic measurement] means. A form of the detector I have outlined WOULD function as a "gravity wave" detector.

However my initial reason for developing the idea was to discover the BEST [most likely] possible means of communication by an advanced civilisation. This is necessarily fast - much faster than light, of infinite range - [relatively] unaffected by maybe all the mass in the universe, and lastly, not easily discoverable by the (possibly) cruder life forms [such as we are].

I think the detector - outlined at setigift.html and linked pages - will act as a crude detector of an ftl transmission using modulation of the UEF. [A transmitter would be a more complex affair.]

The limiting factor [as to what signal content can be transmitted or received ] in both is of course the response speed of the modulating or demodulating mechanism, in our model the response of whatever are chosen as gamma-ray detectors and comparator.  yours RD

DIAGRAM of basic SETI Detector/Demodulator




IT SEEMS ADVISABLE NOT TO TRANSMIT ELECTROMAGNETIC SIGNALS FOR S.E.T.I. PURPOSES, AND  NOT TO EXPECT TO RECEIVE USEFUL ELECTROMAGNETIC SIGNALS.

THEREFORE WE SHOULD TRY TO INTERCEPT ANY U.E.F.SIGNALLING BETWEEN ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY GROUPS

REASONS ARE AT setigift2.html#INTELLIGENCE


[ Google ]


Perceptions MAIL

can we

take off the blindfolds?


WEB-MASTERS
Visit W3Schools
NEW PAGE TIPS
Help build the largest human-edited directory on the web.
Submit a Site - Open Directory Project - Become an Editor



happy?

struggling editor ?

`Perceptions'

HOME


broken link? - please tell
mail Perceptions

Copyright © 2009 Ray Dickenson

this page
http://www.perceptions.couk.com/uef/setigift1.html




PRIVACY POLICY

Map IP Address



Share This

FACEBOOK TWITTER GOOGLE+ TUMBLR PINTEREST REDDIT EMAIL