Subject: final _equal update_
   Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 10:35:30 +0100
   From: Ray Dickenson 
   ("To" is list of official agencies) 
    Hello,
    apologies for not alerting you all immediately - but only a week or so
    has passed since "Perceptions" publication (of additions to
    radiation.html - see below).

    Since reading - today - the following page 
    > http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/bpp/TM-1998-208400.htm
    > NASA BREAKTHROUGH PROPULSION PHYSICS PROGRAM
    > web version 08/20/99

    and realizing that - QUOTE 
    > "Since the first two breakthroughs could require breakthroughs in energy generation, and
    since the physics underlying the propulsion goals is closely linked to energy physics, it is
    also of interest to discover fundamentally new modes of energy generation. The principle
    phenomena of interest for this category is, again, the vacuum fluctuations. It has been
    theorized that this energy can be extracted without violating conservation of energy or any
    thermodynamic laws [20, 21]. It is still unknown if this vacuum energy exists as predicted,
    how much energy might be available to extract, and what the secondary consequences would be
    of extracting vacuum energy." END QUOTE 
 
    it seems that "Perceptions" pages
    http://www.perceptions.couk.com/blinded.html , /footnotes2.html , 
    /UEFindex , etc. have been ignored or simply have not reached their
    intended readers.

    More seriously, that some of you may think you are at dead ends while
    others could be aware of new information (guidance) now published at
    http://www.perceptions.couk.com/uef/radiation.html#proofy 

    Experiments A and B should be carried out with more efficient rotating
    magnetic fields in place of mass rotor [since you are all well qualified
    to be aware of possible radiation dangers].

    The following information will result QUOTE FROM ABOVE "this vacuum
    energy exists as predicted, how much energy might be available to
    extract, and what the secondary consequences would be of extracting
    vacuum energy" UNQUOTE

    In publishing the UEFindex and associated pages I have tried to serve
    British interests as far as I have been allowed [but NESTA
    procrastination has prevented this], then international science
    interests, then space exploration as a whole [but NASA personnel are
    similarly restricted by bureaucracy].

    It is understandable that hard working professionals could be 'upset' at
    being advised but they will not be excused, by present web readers or by
    more knowledgeable future generations, if political machinations,
    'snobbery' or personal ambitions impede the progress we urgently need
    and which is _now_ possible.

    regards

    Ray Dickenson

   -----------------------------------------------------
    "Perceptions" note Aug '01

    That went out a while ago - and things have changed since then,
    now everybody's jockeying for position and acquisition.

    Always wondered how von Braun felt when he had to run for cover,
    except - we don't have to run for cover - or do we ?
    ----------------------------------------------------
              FURTHER REFERENCES

 GO - "search perceptions" - in SEARCH-ENGINE


file-ID www.perceptions.couk.com/uef/proof1.txt