Subject: Re: so-called "Q theory" - was `final theory'
Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2005 13:07:30 +0000
From: ray.dickenson@...

Stewart Smith wrote:
> 
> Ray D wrote:

>> Feel he was quite right - don't think there are `continuous
>> structures' in this universe. If worried (or just interested)
>> check "why're scientists scared?" in Google
> 
> Isn't that just quantum theory though?  If you look close enough the
> continuum breaks up into discrete levels, light breaks up into photons
> and electrons can only occupy certain bands.  If that was what einstein
> was worried about it makes sense.


 There's a problem with that misnomer "quantum theory" though - because quantum
 is a measurement and prediction method _without_ a theoretical model.

 (although lots of folk assign their own `probability' mythology to it)

 Richard Feynman, architect of much of Q.E.D. (quantum electro-dynamics) was
 frank: quantum doesn't even cover all physics - "Gravitation is, so far, not
 understood in terms of other phenomena."

 And even where the quantum method _does_ work (simple energy and particle
 physics), he admitted there's no theoretical model behind the measurement &
 prediction - "You see, my students don't understand it either. That is because
 I don't understand it. Nobody does."
 - ["Q.E.D." 1990 ISBN 0-14-012505-1]

 As a result `quantum' is great for set experiments - but only with things in
 same box, so to speak. It falls down anywhere else - like in `entanglement'
 results.
    
 Having no laboratory, had to come at things from other direction - being forced
 to get to understand things before making predictions.

 Result - got something capable of predicting `out of the box' and accurately -
 like increased seismic risks (& Foucault pendula eclipse effects), like `no
 black holes', like damage to humans of (relative) high angular velocity
 (so-called DVT + more - now saving lives), like Solar flares (NASA said it
 can't be done), like real reason for GRBs and therefore probable dangers of
 Seyfert galaxies (`jets'), like human & animal fertility (& `aging' process),
 like unexplained effects on spacecraft (& physical effects on astronauts  -
 now proven), like photon &  electron definition (explaining two-slit `mystery'),
 - and other things you can search for.

 Don't take my word for any of that - "search perceptions" w/keywords for datable
 emails and letters before eventual confirmations and (unpreventable) publicity
 - and some Press, media & gov't reactions (mostly censorship & suppression -
 they're scared).

 I know all that is painful to the average person's `perceptions' - because it's
 easier to believe what we're told by establishments; but maybe reflect on this:-

 all establishment hype on physics has proved to be wrong

 cheers
 Ray D

"Perceptions" http://www.perceptions.couk.com

 Nb : forgot to include - solution of air-rage / road-rage probs; definitions
 of "consciousness" i.e. for safe driving, mental health; and why a driver's
 conversation (w/mobile) can be deadly.

---------------------------------------------

              FURTHER REFERENCES

  GO - "search perceptions" - in SEARCH-ENGINE


file-ID www.perceptions.couk.com/uef/nlyfinal.txt