Perceptions updateIndex of PerceptionsPerceptions site mapsearch Perceptions
UEF Theory
comment + criticism welcome

`Perceptions' ITEM
Copyright © 2009 Ray Dickenson
Welcome - Chinese Peace - Arabic
Dream - Russian Soul Duty - Sanskrit

Crystals

crystal - van Heesch bros domain

Crystals are not what scientists once thought

when they only knew Earth crystals

see Blind Science



We now know that crystals grown out in near space grow bigger, more regular in structure and denser - more pure - in composition

Some scientists still seem to think that this is due to "less gravity";
they call those conditions 'micro-gravity'







Actually, UEF Theory says 'shielding' of UEF intensity, by Earth's mass say, causes Earth-grown crystals to be less dense, and, because that 'shielding' is greatest in the direction of Earth's core, Earth grown crystals are also irregular in structure.





Now, knowing the real reasons for Earth-crystals' deficiencies, we can do something about them. Without sending hugely expensive payloads of not very much material into space.

Merely spinning crystal-growing material at high revolutions will amplify UEF interaction and therefore effective UEF intensity, increasing crystals' density and purity.

To cure the problem of crystal irregularity simultaneously shielding material - from space-direction UEF - will balance overall UEF intensity and achieve more regular formations.





Not as easy as it sounds. It's necessary to calibrate, match and maintain different revolution rates.

The material must be rapidly spun to increase all-round UEF interaction.

And a high density mass or magnetic field - of a shape selected for shielding required - must be spinning above the crystal-growing material.

Rates of rotation have to be maintained to get `perfect' crystals.





More than just financial advantages.

Because we have the room and the materials handy here on Earth we can experiment with differing powers of UEF shielding and rates of UEF interaction to achieve different - perhaps yet unknown - types of crystal formation that would not normally grow on Earth or in Space.





Later : Same effects apply to optical polymer films and heavy metal glass fibres being developed for space and supercomputer use. At present these are manufactured expensively and slowly in space.

Check http://science.nasa.gov/newhome/headlines/msad18may99_1.htm :- go to "1g :µg" examples, and http://science.nasa.gov/newhome/headlines/msad03jun97_1.htm





H. E. Anderson and Bill Reid seem to have some similar but undeveloped thoughts in the final three paragraphs of this long report - go down to REFERENCES at bottom then back up three para's

If they had tried a rotor made of lead - a massy gyroscope, or even a rotating magnetic field, in place of the block of lead, we say the effects would have been more pronounced. See radiation where maybe we should've included a crystallization proof along with other experiment stuff

APPLIED PHYSICS COMMUNICATIONS, 4(2-3), 217-239 (1984)
"VICINAL, LONG RANGE AND EXTREMELY LONG RANGE EFFECTS ON GROWTH OF SODIUM CHLORIDE CRYSTALS FROM AQUEOUS SOLUTIONS CONTAINING PROTEIN"
By "H. E. Anderson, Bill Reid Queen Elizabeth II Research Institute for Mothers and Infants, The University of Sydney Sydney, 2006, Australia"

It's about crystals, mentioning - amongst other things - change in growth in the presence of mass (a lump of lead). As seen at footnotes3 and in UEF pages, mass has a directly proportional UEF-shielding effect.





H. E. Anderson and Bill Reid make some observations and comments in the final three paragraphs of report
Scroll down to REFERENCES at bottom then back up three para's

The mere nearby presence of mass of dense MATTER (lead - in this case), attenuated the binding force that controls the growth of the crystals

So the crystals are distorted - growing more loosely - in the attenuating field of the nearby mass (lump of lead)


A gyro or rotating 'magnetic field' has stronger effect.





Abstract also at http://www.enigmas.org/aef/lib/biogen/crystals.shtml
or at mirror site





N.A.S.A Release 21Nov01

What d'you think?






But some crystals remain even more mysterious to blind science

You might've found that scientists don't talk much about `quasi-crystals';
they were deemed a `scandalous subject'

Why? - Because they're supposed to be IMPOSSIBLE by the rules of `accepted' science






Ironically, the same symmetry that `science' deems impossible gives certain crystals increased sensitivity to inertial information carried by UEF.

That instantaneous, non-local transfer of info is used by some `forbidden' quasi-crystals for their own construction, and could be expected to give to certain crystal the power to `demodulate' or detect other information carried by UEF.

Check instantaneous effects

and alternative detectors


[ Google ]


Perceptions MAIL

can we

take off the blindfolds?


WEB-MASTERS
Visit W3Schools
NEW PAGE TIPS
Help build the largest human-edited directory on the web.
Submit a Site - Open Directory Project - Become an Editor



happy?

struggling editor ?

`Perceptions'

HOME


broken link? - please tell
mail Perceptions

Copyright © 2009 Ray Dickenson

this page
http://www.perceptions.couk.com/uef/crystal.html



PRIVACY POLICY

Map IP Address



Share This

FACEBOOK TWITTER GOOGLE+ TUMBLR PINTEREST REDDIT EMAIL