UK's Double Standards - The Rich get Public Money - Poorer Folk Don't. The Bank of England's Rules for Protection of Savers. 1989 - When a high-risk investment fund collapsed (see Barlow Clowes Scandal) at first the Bank of England said it couldn't help because the investment fund (for foolish rich people) was a `gamble'. That was true. About a week later, when it became evident there were some really rich and influential `investors' in the Barlow-Clowes `fund', the Bank of England suddenly and inexplicably changed its mind, and paid all those rich people `reparation' from public funds - from money taken from us poorer tax-payers. 2006 - When a "safe" no-interest Christmas Saving account (for poor people) proves to be an incompetent (or corrupt) scam (see Farepak Collapse) the Bank of England isn't interested at all - that's just poor people's money. That shouldn't happen in a `democracy' surely? Right. First - in UK the elected representatives MPs / congress are made rich, given millionaires incomes on taking office - see `MPs pay'. SO they are not motivated to represent the interests of ordinary folk - only the rich. Second - UK is _not_ a democracy. It has NO free nomination of candidates, NO free (secret) voting - due to marked voting papers, NO equal represention - due to corrupt `party' system, NO accountability - due MPs arranging to be paid automatically rather than by the forebearance of their constituents. note: in the very first year of that corrupt arrangement an observer said it was immediately obvious that MPs started behaving irresponsibly and selfishly - because now their constituents couldn't withhold their wages. (See `Diary of Samuel Pepys' - previously, if an MP mis-behaved, it was not unknown for his constituents to stop or reduce his pay.) note2: only one type of person, regardless of the market, can decide his own income - a thief! ------------------------------------------------ FURTHER REFERENCES GO - "search perceptions" - in SEARCH-ENGINE file-ID www.perceptions.couk.com/two-face.txt