Long-Destroyed Fifth Planet May Have Caused Lunar Cataclysm, Researchers Say HOUSTON, TEXAS -- Our solar system may have had a fifth terrestrial planet, one that was swallowed up by the Sun. But before it was destroyed, the now missing-in-action world made a mess of things. Space scientists John Chambers and Jack Lissauer of NASA's Ames Research Center hypothesize that along with Mercury, Venus, Earth, and Mars - the terrestrial, rocky planets - there was a fifth terrestrial world, likely just outside of Mars's orbit and before the inner asteroid belt. Moreover, Planet V was a troublemaker. The computer modeling findings of Chambers and Lissauer were presented during the 33rd Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, held here March 11-15, and sponsored by NASA and the Lunar and Planetary Institute. It is commonly believed that during the formative years of our solar system, between 3.8 billion and 4 billion years ago, the Moon and Earth took a pounding from space debris. However, there is an on-going debate as to whether or not the bruising impacts tailed off 3.8 billion year ago or if there was a sudden increase - a "spike" - in the impact rate around 3.9 billion years ago, with quiet periods before and afterwards? This epoch of time is tagged as the "lunar cataclysm" - also a wakeup call on the cosmological clock when the first evidence of life is believed to have appeared on Earth. The great cover-up Having a swarm of objects clobbering the Moon in a narrow point of time would have resurfaced most of our celestial next door neighbor, covering up its early history. Being that the Moon is so small, Earth would have been on the receiving end of any destructive deluge too. Moon-walking astronauts brought back a cache of lunar material. Later analysis showed that virtually all impact rocks in the "Apollo collection" sported nearly the same age, 3.9 billion years, and none were older. But some scientists claim that these samples were "biased", as they came from a small area of the Moon, and are the result of a localized pummeling, not some lunar big bang. There is a problem in having a "spike" in the lunar cratering rate. That scenario is tough to devise. Things should have been settling down, according to solar system creation experts. Having chunks of stuff come zipping along some hundreds of millions of years later out of nowhere and create a lunar late heavy bombardment is a puzzler. If real, what were these bodies, and where were they before they scuffed up the Moon big time? The answer, according to Chambers and Lissauer, might be tied to the the Planet V hypothesis. "The extra planet formed on a low-eccentricity orbit that was long-lived, but unstable," Chambers reported. About 3.9 billion years ago, Planet V was perturbed by gravitational interactions with the other inner planets. It was tossed onto a highly eccentric orbit that crossed the inner asteroid belt, a reservoir of material much larger than it is today. Planet V's close encounters with the inner belt of asteroids stirred up a large fraction of those bodies, scattering them about. The perturbed asteroids evolved into Mars crossing orbits, and temporarily enhanced the population of bodies on Earth-crossing orbits, and also increased the lunar impact rate. After doing its destabilizing deeds, Planet V was lost too, most likely spinning into the Sun, the NASA team reported. The temporary existence of more than 4 planet-sized bodies in the inner Solar System is consistent with the currently favored model for the formation of the Moon. Work by Chambers and Lissauer also supports the view that our Moon is a leftover of a massive collision between Earth and a Mars-sized body 50 million to 100 million years after the formation of the Solar System. Striking view Wendell Mendell, a planetary scientist here at NASA's Johnson Space Center, said the new theory is intriguing. "This idea and others within the last few years show that the Solar System is filled with all sorts of gravitational resonances ... that a lot of potential orbits in the Solar System are chaotic and unstable," Mendell told SPACE.com. "My sense is that this is a new idea. It's another thing to throw into the pot that's not totally crazy." The work suggests there's a match up in timing, Mendell said, with asteroids striking the Moon and causing the effects that are seen in the dating of Apollo lunar rocks. "By thinking that the Solar System was really quite different in a major way with an extra inner planet, we might be able to develop some sort of self- consistent scenario that explains a lot of things. But all this is at the very early stages now," Mendell said. "We're moving into a really new regime," Mendell added, "where the Solar System is not a static dynamic place from day one to now. It really might have had some nuances and synchronicities associated with it that we have not really tried to exploit before." It takes a drill hole Setting the early Solar System and lunar history record straight means going back to the Moon. "The Moon is still the keystone to our understanding of the Solar System," NASA's Mendell said. That too is the view of Apollo 17 astronaut, Harrison "Jack" Schmitt. Getting back to the Moon to sort out the real story is a must, he said. "You're going to have to be very, very specific on what sites you go to collect new samples," Schmitt told SPACE.com. "It may be very difficult to get an answer without using missions to fairly large impact craters that penetrate through the ejecta. Those impacts are sort of a drill hole into the lunar crust," he said. Dating service Places on the Moon where older, large basins have deposited ejecta are ideal research zones, Schmitt said. Digging into such sites could yield impact glass formed by basins perhaps dating older than 3.9 billion years old, he said. Just taking spot samples - say from the Moon's South Pole Aitken basin - could be risky, in terms of uncovering the Moon's rocky history, Schmitt said. Such a huge area would take multiple robotic or human exploration missions, each with significant roving abilities. Also known as the "Big Backside Basin," Aitken is the largest impact crater on the Moon, and one of the biggest in the Solar System. For the near term, sets of low-cost, mini-robotic landers carrying specialized gear would be ideal in opening up the Moon to further exploration, Schmitt said. "Numbers of targeted missions could get a lot of great information on some of these fundamental questions that we still haven't been able to answer," Schmitt said. Getting back to the Moon with a settlement for resource exploitation is another step forward. From such a site, human explorers can survey various lunar locales - even the Moon's side that we Earthlings never see, Schmitt said. "Then we can do the kind of thing that Apollo did for the near side of the Moon," he said. By Leonard David Senior Space Writer posted: 03:00 pm ET 18 March 2002 http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/solarsystem/fifth_planet_020318.html ------ Asteroid 'caused greatest mass extinction' A giant asteroid decimated life on Earth not once but twice, according to new geological evidence. Scientists say the findings suggest that a space rock smashing into the Earth accounted for the biggest mass extinction the world has ever known. More than 90% of all marine life and about 70% of land animals and plants vanished at the boundary between the Permian and Triassic periods 251 million years ago. The catastrophe cleared the way for the rise of the dinosaurs and mammals. Scientists are fairly certain that an asteroid impact wiped out the dinosaurs at the Cretaceous-Tertiary (K-T) boundary 65 million years ago. But the cause of the Permian-Triassic (P-T) extinction is much more controversial. Theories to explain the event have included sea-level changes, global cooling, volcanic eruptions, as well as an impact from space. A team headed by Asish Basu, from the University of Rochester, New York, claimed to have found new mineralogical evidence pointing to a P-T asteroid impact. It consists of dozens of unusual mineral grains from two Antarctic rock samples dating from this period. The grains appear to be fragments from a "chondritic" meteorite - a particular type of largely metallic asteroid. The rock layer also contained microscopic bits of almost pure metallic iron, similar to those from Asian sites of a similar age. Mr Basu's team published the results today in the journal Science. Ananova: Story filed: 19:44 Thursday 20th November 2003 http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_840163.html ---------------------------------------------- Meteor Impact Database http://www.unb.ca/passc/ImpactDatabase/ Terrestrial Impact Craters http://www.solarviews.com/eng/tercrate.htm Early guess http://www.perceptions.couk.com/uef/thump.txt Reclassification http://www.perceptions.couk.com/uef/thump2.txt Reclassification http://www.perceptions.couk.com/uef/thump3.txt A plea http://www.perceptions.couk.com/uef/complasens.txt Simulate your own asteroid-earth-impact! http://epic2.ece.arizona.edu/~rmarcus/crater2.html ----------------------------------------------- Our crowded Solar System http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/iau/lists/OuterPlot.html http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/iau/lists/InnerPlot.html http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/iau/lists/InnerPlot2.html ----------------------------------------------- FURTHER REFERENCES GO - "search perceptions" - in SEARCH-ENGINE file-ID www.perceptions.couk.com/thumlate.txt