Jupiter vs. Saturn: Puzzling differences between giants Scientists aren't sure what the interiors of Jupiter and Saturn look like or how the planets formed. But a new study of their insides suggests they took different paths to giant status. The elemental makeup of Jupiter and Saturn is similar, so why would only Saturn end up with a heavy core? NASA/JPL Researchers modeled 50,000 what-ifs of internal structure using real data from the two planets and lab experiments that show how material behaves under extreme pressure. They found Saturn has a huge core and Jupiter may have none. "Heavy elements are concentrated in Saturn's massive core, while those same elements are mixed throughout Jupiter, with very little or no central core at all," said Didier Saumon of the Los Alamos National Laboratory. Why so different? Both planets are about 70% hydrogen. Most of the rest of their makeup is helium. The remaining "heavy elements" include iron, silicon, carbon, nitrogen and oxygen. But why would only Saturn end up with a heavy core? The question is a troubling one for planet-formation theorists. The leading model for giant planet formation involves first growing a core of rock and ice several times the mass of Earth. Once big enough, this core easily attracts and holds onto gas, sweeping through the nascent solar system and glomming on to hydrogen and other elements left behind in the Sun's formation. But this so-called core-accretion model has a problem. It takes millions of years to build a gas giant, and observations of other star systems suggests the gas swirling around a newborn star doesn't hang around that long. "We don't really believe the two planets would have formed by two processes so different," he said. By Robert Roy Britt, SPACE.com Posted 7/20/2004 12:31 PM http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/2004-07-20-jupiter-vs-saturn_x.htm -------------------------------------------------- FURTHER REFERENCES GO - "search perceptions" - in SEARCH-ENGINE file-ID www.perceptions.couk.com/solmodelx.txt