A message to three politicians
Being in a political no-mans land - front door in Powys, back door in Shropshire,
nearest large town Wrexham - it seems sensible to send this first to you
three - luckily you are a cross-section.
NESTA suppresses two British breakthroughs - because inventor criticized
civil service corruption.
The first, a physics and wider science discovery, is very advanced. There
may be only two British scientists and mathematicians who understand its
However, an international science readership - NASA, CERN, NE, universities,
gov't energy, corporate energy and propulsion, has been downloading the theory
and subsequent links. NASA is already thought to be quietly using its
results (see attached application 1), and CERN's
recent decision may have been influenced by the theory.
International science, or at least those two British scientists - Roger Penrose
(Oxford) and Ian Stewart (Warwick) should have had the chance to assess the
theory before NESTA banned support in Britain. Anything less will be shoddy
treatment, possibly corrupt behaviour and another loss to Britain.
The second breakthrough, a revision of evolutionary theory, is also
controversial. It was attacked last week (02Nov BBC R4), when
Melvyn Bragg possibly hoped to get senior
establishment evolutionists to deny the theory - which Melvyn referred to
as "pop evolution" throughout. He clearly disliked its conclusions.
[ Explanation : Mr Bragg might dislike the theory because a quotation
of his claim for the superiority of an elite, and the public refutation of
that claim by two world class social historians, was posted in the
readers' Q&A of the "Altruist Survivor Theory" as a two-fold confirmation
of the theory's secondary predictions. Amongst its many conclusions the
theory forecasts that elites - far from being 'super' - are continually
Anyway, the attempt failed. The experts [Steven Rose - Gresham Professor
of Physics (auth. "Alas Poor Darwin"), Nicholas Humphrey - Professor of
Psychology, New School of Social Research N.Y.(auth. "How to Solve the Mind/Body
Problem") and Janet Radcliffe-Richards, Reader in Bio-Ethics UCL (auth. "Humanity
after Darwin")], even if miffed at being outshone by a non-professional,
refused to attack the theory. Mr Bragg seemed a bit annoyed by the end of
Surely those pre-eminent professionals should have assessed the theory before
NESTA suppresses it in Britain ?
Anything less would be shoddy treatment, possibly corrupt behaviour, and
exhibits the 'dog-in-a-manger' civil service attitude which denies any British
achievement not approved by an 'elite' - (see attached
log records, it is clear NESTA had not accessed any of the information
submitted for assessment. Significantly NESTA had accessed just one
criticising the disorganized, bureaucratic and unfriendly layout of NESTA's
web page and their possibly corrupt "Lotterylike" disposal of funds so far.
Why should NESTA suppress new, real ideas in science? Is this why Britain
is seen as racist & stuffy, arrogant & backward by the rest of the
world ? (British Council - Foreign Policy Centre Report 09 Nov.'00).
Last note: the information is posted on the
`Perceptions' web-site, which is people-friendly
and popular world-wide with teachers, students, schools, corporate workers,
scientists, lots of media, military and even families,
And `Perceptions' is all-British - despite the
advertisers [only] being forward-looking USA firms - who actually apply for
space (indicating their perceptions of its audience).
[NESTA has address]
ray at perceptions