Update on English Press / media - 27 Nov 2001
"The Press Complaints Commission . . . is not an organization that I, or any good journalist, has much faith in"
On UK media generally - "an industry which is going badly wrong"
Lying / falsifying 'reports' . . . "is ingrained into the culture"
Alex Renton - 27 November 2001 ["The Choice" 0900 BBC R4]
Update - 2005
The UK Press is more heavily censored than Czech Republic, Slovenia, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, and Trinidad and Tobago.
Check Worldwide Press Freedom Index 2005
In Britain there is a Press which is a handful of nationals and a whole bunch of locals - all owned by three or four millionaires who pay little or no tax. 100link
And the biggest broadcaster is the BBC, ruled by elite (and corrupt) civil-service types. 101link
The BBC takes its income from British people by a regressive tax - the Licence Fee. [regressive - taking more from the poor than from the rich ]
The high licence fee is mandatory to receive TV in Britain. The BBC steals from the poor by charging a high flat fee [theoretically for Public Broadcasting] that the rich don't even notice.
Britain has a population of 60 - 70 million people, all with ongoing stories
These real stories are not wanted by the BBC, whose agenda is revealed when you look at BBC telephone access policy:-
it accepts toll-free calls only for "chat shows" and "advice lines" etc., where 'controversy' - ie. reality - is either faded-out, or banned. 102
All other calls - votes in referenda, votes in radio/TV debates, phone-in input to "quality" programmes, complaints, requests, are charged at premium or high national (trunk call) rates, often hitting people with long wait times and high potential costs.
That's to ensure that poorer working people - who can't risk incurring extra costs - daren't express their opinion.
"A trade full of rotters"
That subtitle phrase was a rare event - a piece of truth in British media.
It came in a moment of shock - the murder of Jill Dando - and referred to her 'niceness'; a quality usually unknown in British journalists, as a colleague admitted in a front-page confession.
Why should that be? In America and Europe we have met many likable and no doubt decent people who work in the media; why does UK reportedly have only `nasty, untrustworthy people' as our journalists?
Research shows British press / broadcasters have been deceitful for generations.
Any other 'journalism' seems rare, almost forbidden, in Britain.
Working class, or minority folk in favour of liberty are routinely vilified by the majority of English newspapers and by the BBC.
[ Until recently 103link the whole British media were defaming people like Paul Robson, Nelson Mandela and Steve Biko. They were libelled and abused by English press and broadcasters
But now we know the truth - when the English press were labelling Nelson Mandela and Steve Biko as "mindless agitators, thugs and back-alley murderers" those press-men were working to the orders of the English elite, who own the press and control the BBC.
Now we know that Robson, Mandela and Biko were intellectual giants of their time, international patriots and humanists, as the best of us would wish to be. ]
So who are the "thugs" in the debate?
The friends of the English elite - murderers and abusers working to perpetuate apartheid / elitism / corruption. 104link
Those whose actions 105link are supported by the English BBC, Press and media.
A bizarre, disturbing set of current events - at review.html
Pervs - Our research has revealed why this should be.
The last time a British journalist tried to expose evil and perverted people in places of power [a network of rich, privileged child-abusers], that brave editor was jailed, confirmation that politicians and judges were protecting highly placed pederasts.
It is now obvious that many of the politicians, bishops and judges involved were themselves criminal perverts, organised pedophiles hiding behind the cynical abuse of establishment power. 106link
In 2003 - does that remind you of the English elite today?
Available evidence shows the British establishment has not changed all that much. Could it be - since the media cannot tell the truth about central facts - that membership of the trade is now limited to 'yes-men' liars and toadies approved by that establishment?
English journalists with significant access to the public ear or eye are secretly awarded special tax privileges - as are politicians - by senior civil service bureaucrats. This effectively controls and censors media coverage of Britain's corrupt taxes.
Details at coverup
Several years ago we - (i.e - me) - were asked by a sub-editor of a national newspaper (which claimed absolute impartiality and independence) to provide him with a 'good' letter on taxation.
It was during an electioneering period - the sub-editor said he was not getting clear comprehensible letters on British taxation from his readers. Can you wonder after reading the history of BBC censorship and obfuscation?
After I explained my willingness to write a letter which would cover all tax matters - including preferential tax allowances given to those with influence (especially senior media) - he demurred, saying that he would not be able to print those parts.
And when I gently suggested that his own tax privileges were responsible for that attitude - which can only be termed corrupt - he was taken aback: dismayed.
details at "Inequality"
English media routinely fulminate against "drug use".
But they are lying for racial and political motives. (Seen here)
They are not only hypocrites - they are criminal liars.
`Perceptions' note: We have knowledge of media brass (BBC) using hard drugs while broadcasting hypocritical condemnation of poorer people's occasional use of relatively harmless herbs.
Press and BBC lies - read confirmation at BBC coke link
From examples above and below it can be seen that :-
British police-chiefs, judges and legislators use law corruptly
We believe that the journalist Dando was eliminated because she was "a genuinely nice person", and incapable of hiding disgusting crimes (against children?), committed by highly placed members of the elite or their police / secret-police / MI-5 etc.
but read the HTML for the message, which is otherwise hidden
"View" then "Page Source" to see HTML
2001 Update on Dando assassination.
2006 Update on Dando assassination.
Background time sequence promise - unholy - centers - warning - warning2 - Seema1 (html) & prosecutors admission
Later NEWS - A newspaper [ the "Shropshire Star"] plays down an alleged "race murder" of one of its own employees. Why? - See Seema1.html
but again read the HTML for the message, it's otherwise hidden.
Later note: After Seema1, maybe try a look at gutelford11.html & pervperps bentcops23 and pedos which confirm our earlier-published suspicions re : drug / (& pedo?) rings within authorities, police & media.
`Perceptions' 1997 WARNING
`Perceptions' 1999 WARNING
"organized pedophiles hold secret authority in England"
FRAUDS, SADISTS & PERVERTS HIDDEN IN / BY COUNTY AUTHORITY, IN? / BY COUNTY NEWSPAPER, IN /? BY COUNTY POLICE-FORCE
authority, review, mediauk
THE BIG GOVERNMENTS - USA, EU, RUSSIA, CANADA, INDIA, AUSTRALIA ALL CLAIM TO BE DEDICATED TO TRUTH & FREEDOM OF INFORMATION.
THEREFORE JOURNALISTS SHOULD BE ABLE TO TRAVEL AND REPORT FREELY; ANY ACTION AGAINST THEM SHOULD BE IMMEDIATELY AVENGED BY THE MILITARY MIGHT OF THE GREAT GOVERNMENTS.
THAT DOESN'T HAPPEN!
JOURNALISTS ARE PRESSURIZED, ATTACKED, KIDNAPPED, TORTURED AND MURDERED IN ALL COUNTRIES OF THE WORLD - BUT NO ACTION IS TAKEN BY BIG GOVERNMENTS
ARLINGTON, Va. (AP) - The names of 40 journalists killed around the world last year were added Wednesday to a lengthening roster on a memorial wall of gleaming glass [Journalists Memorial by The Freedom Forum]. Wednesday's additions brought to 1,369 the number of men and women - writers, reporters, editors, photographers and their colleagues - who died while doing their jobs. "The wall is filled with the names of journalists who cared and cared deeply about their craft and their responsibilities. They felt journalism is something worth risking their lives for," said Tom Johnson, chairman and CEO of Cable News Network.
UPDATE- 2005 56 killed in 2004 while reporting
THE COROLLARY : IF THERE'S AN AFFLUENT, RESPECTABLE & SAFE JOURNALIST
- You can be sure -
THAT JOURNALIST IS COVERING-UP SCANDALS / PEDDLING PROPAGANDA
1 Cover-ups - try the htm
html comment - snap analysis, written immediately after the Dando murder-event, before subsequent 'trickle-out' of mis-information.
Go VIEW - SOURCE CODE / HTML-SOURCE
2 Centers of Abuse (in UK) probably linked
3 Abusive Media (in UK)
4 Warnings ignored by media - reasons suggested above.
5 Why the elite need to control the media?