Police warned over evidence disclosure Police officers and lawyers who fail to comply with new guidelines on the disclosure of evidence should face disciplinary action, the Attorney General, Lord Williams of Mostyn, warned yesterday. The new rules, published yesterday, address concern over weaknesses in legislation that still have the potential to lead to miscarriages of justice. From yesterday, all defendants are to be given access to all unused material obtained by the police. Lord Williams said the guidelines would help to bring to an end miscarriages of justice, which he described as a "travesty" of the criminal justice system. Since the Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996 introduced a new scheme for the disclosure of information by the prosecution growing concerns have been expressed about its operation. A recent review of disclosure undertaken by the Crown Prosecution Service Inspectorate this year found that the Act did not have the "confidence of criminal practitioners". Lord Williams said too many criminal trials had become trials of what should or should not be disclosed and less about the guilt of a defendant. He said he would be disappointed if police officers and lawyers who committed "gross" breaches of the guidelines were not disciplined. The Director of Public Prosecutions, David Calvert-Smith QC, said: "Fair, timely and focused disclosure of material gathered by the police and others, which may undermine the prosecution case or assist the defence, is a vital component of a civilised criminal justice process. "Without it the innocent will be convicted, the guilty acquitted and the system as a whole will lose the respect of the public for whose benefit it exists." By Robert Verkaik 30 November 2000 "The Independent" - English broadsheet ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 30 November 2000 "Perceptions" note: The above statements mean that before 29 November 2000 "...the innocent will be convicted, the guilty aquitted . . ." under Britain's justice system. And - because there are still no safeguards, only pious hopes - this may persist. But this state of affairs [only now officially confirmed by the Director of Public Prosecutions, David Calvert-Smith QC ], was and is always denied by most of those involved, those who obtain power and prestige (and money) from running the system: politicians, judges, barristers (English elite lawyers) and senior policemen (and some politically motivated media commentators). Therefore we can see that until now - and necessarily continuing - Britain's justice system has and is administered and reported mainly by self-interested liars and hypocrites. This is to be expected - the "Altruist Survivor" principle says so. R J-D - - - - - - - - - - - footnote to http://www.perceptions.couk.com/laworjustice.html which is itself a footnote to the Altruist Survivor: http://www.perceptions.couk.com/genes1.html - genes8b.html ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FURTHER REFERENCES GO - "search perceptions" - in SEARCH-ENGINE file-ID www.perceptions.couk.com/inevidence.txt