 |
 |
TRADUZIR |  |
 |
Subject: "Why Brits have to work longer for less"
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 09:42:22 +0100
Hello Nicky Campbell
This is well in time to get on your program but I doubt if you will be allowed
to read it out.
Why ? Because the BBC's high income governors and executives pay low taxes
while the working middle classes and the working poor in Britain pay very
high, very inefficient and very corrupt tax rates averaging 70 to 80% of
their real earnings.
But they are not allowed to know this !
And the BBC is forbidden to allow truthful discussion of our corrupt and
wasteful tax and wage system.
(Although Charlie Whelan? spilled the beans a few days ago when he said "the
very rich DO NOT pay tax" (his stress)
See "Cruel & Unjust Taxes"
regards
[ ed@perc ]
Subject: "Your tax cover-up"
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 09:33:30 +0100
Hello Nicky
Your program is a red herring.
The question is not whether we pay tax or lose public services.
The questions are:-
1) "Why is half of our tax costs wasted ?"
2) "Why does a working middle-class or working-class person pay between ten
and a hundred time higher rates of direct, indirect, and property tax than
a multi-millionaire ?" see
"Cruel & Unjust Taxes"
3) "Why do many taxes cost three times what the tax brings in ?
4) "Why has every Prime Minister lied about taxes - especially about the
National Insurance Tax, which the rich do not pay (They pay a small flat-rate
"premium" - as you do Nicky) see "Cruel & Unjust Taxes" above
And those are only the first of many questions we could ask - the one that
concerns you is "Why are media people given extra tax allowances and tax
perks ?"
Answer - to keep them censoring the debate on taxes - just like the BBC (
and you ?) are doing today.
regards
[ ed@perc ]
If you want information - like why international tax expert say the British
Tax System went past the "point of not return" (in inefficiency and corrupt
allowances for the rich) fully FORTY REARS AGO - just call [ tel no. ]
regards
[ ed@perc ]
For REARS read YEARS
Thinking on politicians and top civil servants that must have been a freudian
slip
[ ed@perc ]
Subject: "Another cover-up ?"
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 15:51:54 +0100
Hello
You might have heard the most recent program on the British Tax System -
from 9:00 am to 10:30 am, today - 13 July 2000, on Radio 5Live.
Calls (and emails) with factual information were refused.
The presenter, one Nicholas Campbell, did not declare his personal interest
in various tax perks (restricted to an 'elite') and therefore the public
was not warned of the inbuilt bias in the program.
The presenter wound up at ten thirty with the words "It's the best bad system".
Friendly comment on the program and on the BBC record to date is now available
at
http://www.perceptions.couk.com/coverup.html
regards
[ ed@perc ]
Subject: RE: Another cover-up ?
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2000 09:03:42 +0100
Dear [ed@perc],
You are of course welcome to your views about Nicky Campbell, the show and
the BBC but since you are so keen on accuracy i'll just point out one or
two in your E-Mail.
Calls and E-Mails with factual information were refused you say. ; every
day we get ten thousand calls (that's on an average day) of which our phone-in
staff can only physically answer between 5 and 6 hundred. Only fifty of them
can get on air in theree hours. This leaves on an AVERAGE day 9950 callers
disappointed....or "refused" as you'd put it.
I'm also sorry to disappoint you , and many people who think like you, that
there is no "inbuilt bias" on the programme and i invite anyone (and have
done so several times) to come in and see the show and talk to the team.
It's an insult to ten very hard-working people to suggest they work on a
programme of that nature. I receive as many complaints about Nicky being
pro-Labour as i get saying he's pro-Tory yet they're all apparently listening
to the same show.
Also it is worth pointing out that what Nicky says on the radio isn't necessarily
his personal view.
rgds
[exec's name ]
Subject: Re: Another cover-up ?
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2000 15:25:39 +0100
Hello
Thanks for your reply and I understand any feelings you might be expressing.
It is very difficult, some would say impossible, to be totally objective
when you are part of an organization with which you _must_ to some extent
identify, or when your own family or financial interests seem threatened
or criticized.
This is especially true in an era such as this, when the self esteem of most
people is compulsorily tied to income and financial worth.
To avoid such partiality is a challenge - see
www.perceptions.couk.com/morals.html
http://www.perceptions.couk.com/manip.html
http://www.perceptions.couk.com/laworjustice.html
http://www.perceptions.couk.com/enghoo.html
http://www.perceptions.couk.com/genes1.html
http://www.perceptions.couk.com/mediauk.html
http://www.perceptions.couk.com/libel.html
best wishes
[ ed@perc ]
Subject: A great show
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2000 16:19:56 +0100
Hello to the "Sunday Service" three - Glover, Pierce and Whelan (hope
the spelling correct - no time to check)
You all sounded a little downbeat today - even so the unique chemistry of
you three still works.
If the presumed sequence of events outlined at
[changed] was responsible for you getting
a 'wigging' (is that the term you used Andrew ?) then it is to be regretted
-
by the BBC - not by you nor any truthful commentator.
regards
[ ed@perc ]
